<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="Active Blog by Active 24 www.active24.com" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Kneals</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>http://knealsblog.kneals.com/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:27:31 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Active Blog by Active 24 www.active24.com</generator>
        <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:55:00 +0100</pubDate>
        <item>
            <title>Java-test</title>
            <link>http://knealsblog.kneals.com/23186/</link>
            <description></description>
            <author>sciphu@sciphu.com</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:38:00 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Question series: post 2</title>
            <link>http://knealsblog.kneals.com/22731/</link>
            <description>The other day I read the following: &amp;quot;Love for your children is pure breed love&amp;quot;, which sound about right, I guess. But&amp;nbsp; pure breeds are not necessarily better, more adapted or suitable, - often they're worse. 

Is it the same with pure breed love I wonder ?</description>
            <author>sciphu@sciphu.com</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:12:00 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ideas series: post 3  - A Tele Vision</title>
            <link>http://knealsblog.kneals.com/22027/</link>
            <description>I like blogs because blog postings are short and to the point. But, sometimes posts are not to the point and far too long.

I like blogs and friendfeed because you can comment and start a discussion. But, sometimes the audience just isn't there or a response takes to long for the discussion to get going.

I appreciate scientific journals for the solid content they provide. But, it takes too long too read, and it's not accessible to most.

I like friendfeed because it gives me the ability to follow blogs, science news and updates from journals. But, I have too screen the right content to avoid information overload - who knows what I am missing ?

I generally find panel-debates too shallow and uniformed. Very rarely do these debates / news commentaries manage to penetrate the issue in question. To compensate,&amp;nbsp;an expert in a given field is often included. She/he is not always right.

What if you could combine blog-commenting, friendfeedish information flow and panel debates / news commentary.

Wouldn't be so hard. Give the subject beforehand, make a blog posting or similar, receive comments and useful links on the subject. Then have a moderator screen out the relevant comments and information, share with discussion participants and get a discussion going real time. 

This could work on TV, radio, videocasts, podcasts what have you......and any good commenter could receive his/her 15 min of fame.

Something similar is already done with phone calls and SMS I know, but potential for improvement is just enormous.

</description>
            <author>sciphu@sciphu.com</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:18:00 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Question series: post 1</title>
            <link>http://knealsblog.kneals.com/20890/</link>
            <description>Why does &amp;quot;natural&amp;quot; rate higher than &amp;quot;unnatural&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;artificial&amp;quot; ? And does the validity of the answer to that question remain ? - if so for how long ?</description>
            <author>sciphu@sciphu.com</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:55:00 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ideas series: post 2</title>
            <link>http://knealsblog.kneals.com/20788/</link>
            <description>Christmas advent calendar idea for the really rich: The pony calendar - a horse stable needed for the 24th.</description>
            <author>sciphu@sciphu.com</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:04:00 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ideas series: post 1</title>
            <link>http://knealsblog.kneals.com/20414/</link>
            <description>
    License fees for boxed laughter. After all someone produced that laughter. The comedian should get paid - no ?
    Fix hangover with non-alcholic beer. If one can get tricked into drunkeness by drinking non-alcoholic beverages labeled as alcholic (references needed) then presumably one could fix hangovers that way as well.
</description>
            <author>sciphu@sciphu.com</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:55:00 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The beginning of my extended web-presence</title>
            <link>http://knealsblog.kneals.com/20337/</link>
            <description>The first self-hosted post </description>
            <author>sciphu@sciphu.com</author>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:55:00 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
